Materiality Analysis
The nature of HHLA’s business means it has a large number of stakeholders with a variety of expectations and demands. In order to understand these expectations and demands more fully, HHLA conducted a materiality analysis in 2015 as part of its sustainable management activities, in which sustainability topics of political relevance to its internal and external stakeholders were examined. The collection and evaluation of the data was based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines. HHLA performs a stakeholder survey every two years in order to review the results of the materiality analysis and to enable early recognition of changes in stakeholder expectations.
The Stakeholder Survey Process
At a meeting of the Sustainability Council, HHLA’s most significant stakeholders were first identified. This was initially based on internal sources, such as a list of key customers. The main stakeholders identified were customers (e.g. shipping companies), customers’ customers (e.g. forwarders), employees, business partners and suppliers, the media, potential and existing shareholders, associations and institutions, research institutes, political decision makers, NGOs, and local residents close to the terminals.
Secondly, a list of topics known to be relevant to both internal and external stakeholders were was drawn up. The results from HHLA’s sustainability initiative “On Course” were also included in the data collection as the initiative had already discovered relevant topics and determined the main fields of activity. see Sustainability Strategy
A two-week online survey using a standard questionnaire was then carried out worldwide. External stakeholders from all of the groups identified as well as managers from a number of different divisions took part. In total, approximately 100 people rated topics of potential relevance to HHLA, particularly customers, business partners, suppliers and HHLA staff. All stakeholder groups participated in the survey. Stakeholders also had the chance to rate the importance of topics, as well as add to them or make comments on them. The results of the stakeholder survey were discussed during a Sustainability Council meeting and presented to the Executive Board.
Results of the Stakeholder Survey
The materiality matrix shows the ranking of all sustainability topics. The assessments provided by external stakeholders are combined with those of internal stakeholders in the matrix. The result is a prioritisation of the topics. Key aspects are considered material if they are relevant from the point of view of internal and/or external stakeholders.
Ensuring a high level of data protection, high occupational safety standards, sustainable conduct, compliance, energy efficiency, continual improvements in quality, the long-term alignment of corporate strategy and the drafting of a Code of Conduct to ensure non-discriminatory behaviour amongst staff and towards third parties were all rated as very material. The topics of carbon emission reductions, occupational safety and health promotion at suppliers, waste prevention and environmentally appropriate disposal, as well as area optimisation and an active dialogue on topics relevant to port management were regarded as material by the survey participants. With a clear majority, the main reasons stated for HHLA’s sustainable approach were a long-term, stable economic development and a reduction of environmental effects. The majority of those surveyed considered themselves generally well informed regarding sustainability topics.
Due to the high correlation of external and internal stakeholders’ ratings of potentially relevant topics, only slight adjustments had to be made to the weighting of topics compared with earlier reports. The main fields of activity defined during the sustainability initiative were also largely confirmed by the results: none of the potentially relevant topics were rated as immaterial or less material.
|
|
Fields of activity |
|
Relevance for the stakeholders asked |
|
|
|
|
|
Material |
Very material |
General |
|
|
|
Quality of sustainability-related information |
Importance of sustainable conduct |
Ecology |
|
Ecological transport chains |
|
Importance of environmentally friendly transport chains |
|
|
Land conservation |
|
|
Land conservation |
|
|
Nature protection |
|
Minimising resource consumption |
Waste prevention and environmentally appropriate disposal |
|
|
|
Use of sustainable material |
|
||
|
|
Minimising noise emission |
|
||
|
|
Minimising light emission |
|
||
|
Climate protection |
|
|
Climate protection by reducing |
|
|
|
|
Energy efficiency |
||
Society |
|
Occupational safety/ |
|
Promotion of health-conscious behaviour by HHLA |
Promotion of occupational safety and health at HHLA |
|
|
Promotion of occupational safety and health at suppliers |
|||
|
Staff development |
|
Promoting work-life balance |
|
|
|
|
Regular training and education offers |
|
||
|
Compliance |
|
Code of Conduct for employees (beyond legal requirements) |
Non-discriminatory dealings |
|
|
|
Data protection |
|||
|
|
Applying purchasing conditions that ensure suppliers uphold wage and social standards |
Competition compliant behavior |
||
|
Social responsibility |
|
Being a good citizen in society |
Active dialogue regarding issues relevant to port industry |
|
Economy |
|
Added value |
|
Setting technological standards |
Long-term alignment of corporate strategy and economically viable business practices |
|
|
Incorporation of external partners |
|||
|
Business partners |
|
|
Continuous improvement of process quality |
|
|
|
|
Continuous improvement of service quality |
||
|
Shareholders |
|
Comprehensive and transparent communication regarding business developments |
Long-term increase in enterprise value |
In maritime logistics, a terminal is a facility where freight transported by various modes of transport is handled.